Ummm. Yeah. (A) computers are hard. (B) you are one stupid bastard. And (C) what does this have to do with the questions at hand about the hacking scandal?
Friday, December 30, 2016
We need their computer things
Ummm. Yeah. (A) computers are hard. (B) you are one stupid bastard. And (C) what does this have to do with the questions at hand about the hacking scandal?
Thursday, December 29, 2016
Saturday, December 24, 2016
Merry Christmas from President Obama and the First Lady
|
Friday, December 23, 2016
Saturday, December 17, 2016
#MakeAmericaSmartAgain Black widow virus results from evolution, not genetic engineering
http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/news/161206_blackwidow
Friday, December 16, 2016
A pet peeve regarding stupidity
It's all hillarys fault that she lost. The Russians didn't hack anything, that's a lie. You can't brief the electors about anything because they don't have security clearance. The recount failed. Just accept it and move on.
What lays bare here is this persons ignorance. The CIA, as well as the Russians themselves, have said there was an effort to interfere with the election. Let's see what they find before we snap to judgement. That's the American fucking way.
The electors, it is true, don't have high level security clearance. But how about if agents of the CIA present publicly available and relevant facts of the case in a summary to them? Don't filter it through the media or the party. Let them hear it from the source and ask relevant questions. I know why. Because that's rational thinking! Can't have that.
And as for the recounts. Yes, they did Peter out. But do you know why? Because each of the states in question (along with many others) has absurd rules about how a recount works, who pays for it, what triggers it, and if the state supervisor of elections agrees to it. It's a myriad of complex legal questions that aren't easily addressed by just anyone. It goes along with the notion that the elections themselves - from the equipment to the methods used and even ID requirements - are a weird mix that seem ineffective.
The fact that they petered out doesn't mean that they didn't find anything. In fact the anecdotal and early finding suggest otherwise. It is a matter of legal hurdles not being cleared.
As always, educate yourself. Don't open your pie hole to say stuff unless you have an informed position. And don't blindly follow anything.
#Stupidity is today's thought for the day
What I can't tolerate is stupidity. I can't accept that anyone follows things blindly and never questions anything.
You can start the discussion with sports. Some people just follow "their" teams and wind up hating some other team because they're a rival. Doesn't matter if the team is bad, there's always hope for a better tomorrow, a better player or coach, a new owner. Never mind what you pay to be there - after all you give your money and get really nothing in return, other than entertainment. And worse, you're willing to have a verbal or physical altercation with anyone who doesn't see things through your lens.
Next up is religion. I have no issue with anyone believing whatever they want. And following your beliefs in an organized fashion is just fine. But when it dominates everything, then it becomes an issue for me. Don't tell me how I should live. Don't sell me on why your belief is better than someone else's. Don't describe yourself as a [insert religion here] when you are presenting yourself. Be a good person. Follow your beliefs with humility. And most importantly, don't just follow along blindly. Too many wars have been started in the name of religion. Too many people have gotten sucked in and told to give more (financially of course) or to "pray harder" for something...and when it doesn't work out they don't give up the belief, they double down.
And then to politics. I find it frustrating when people from each main party say the other has to be wrong. They label each other (as if it's a dirty word no less) and can't see another point of view. What's the purpose? Aren't we all Americans? Can't we rally around *that*?
To be fair, I admit that I despise the Donald. But it's not because of his party. It's because of HIM. I've detailed that many times. But I find that one party just accepts him blindly - even though he only represents himself and not the party - and the other party is looking for a glimmer of hope and a recognition by the other party to see him as evil.
As I continually remind people, switch roles in your mind. How would you feel if you were on the other side?
I suggest you look at things critically and question everything.
Be reasonable. Stop. Think. Listen. And help yourself by continually learning. Cut out the shit and the noise. Don't follow blindly.
Don't be stupid.