Awesome launch today!
Watch the replay here:
http://www.spacex.com/webcast
Saturday, January 14, 2017
Thursday, January 12, 2017
Wednesday, January 11, 2017
In my opinion: Trump's ties to Russia (and why he's not our president)
There's an old proverb attributed to Confucious that says "may you live in interesting times/" I would say surely, that we are.
The intelligence community has been unequivocal in their assertion that there was some attempt to influence the election. They detailed some in the report that was provided. But there were still whispers that there was more that they had.But lets assume for a moment that there was nothing of that sort. That the donald took the election simply because of ignorance and disinformation being presented. And specifically one traitorous act by Comey in trying to help sway the election "nothing to see here, but please don't vote for Clinton"...shouldn't that in and of itself be enough to invalidate the whole thing, and send him (Comery that is) to prison?
The very sad reality here is that it didn't matter what you and I thought about the election. Doesn't matter who we voted for. Either the election itself was hacked and the outcome was made favorable to one candidate - or the influence of one man's stupid comment swayed it. And in either case, democracy lost.
Lincoln once said something along the lines of "all the armies of europe and asia combined could not take a drink from the mississippi. If destruction be our lot, it must rise up from within."
And surely that's where we are now.
Come on intelligence. Come on actual news agencies. Get us the rest of the story. Don't let us come to our end this way.
And because of the election being tainted and needing an asterisk, I am saying he is not our president. Not now. Not ever.
To be clear about all of this: I don't like the man, but this is NOT about that - this is about democracy, and the greater good.
And one last comment: it sure is a good thing we avoided that email scandal Clinton had. We dodged a bullet there. Whew.
Wednesday, January 4, 2017
The ACA - congrats you were conned
The republican "leadership" is hell bent on doing away with the ACA (Obamacare), but this will be fraught with logistical problems, legal challenges, and other difficulties.
And according to a non partisan group, a repeal will ultimately cost 100s of billions of dollars because the tax structure changed.
Plus of course 10s of millions of Americans will be uninsured, or uninsurable. People will literally die because of this pettiness. And don't look to public hospitals for help, as people did pre-ACA. All of that money was funneled away into this program. There will be no additional funds for routine care, as people had 8 years ago. You either pony up and pay full retail, or go without. There is no in between. Surely some people will choose crushing (and predatory) debt to stay alive. But why should they have to?
So congrats to those of you who thought this was just talk. We're all screwed.
And according to a non partisan group, a repeal will ultimately cost 100s of billions of dollars because the tax structure changed.
Plus of course 10s of millions of Americans will be uninsured, or uninsurable. People will literally die because of this pettiness. And don't look to public hospitals for help, as people did pre-ACA. All of that money was funneled away into this program. There will be no additional funds for routine care, as people had 8 years ago. You either pony up and pay full retail, or go without. There is no in between. Surely some people will choose crushing (and predatory) debt to stay alive. But why should they have to?
So congrats to those of you who thought this was just talk. We're all screwed.
What most people miss
The Donald's insistence that the intelligence community is political motivated, or outright lying, serves a deeper purpose than most people realize.
Sure, on the surface it appears that he is trying to promote a point of view that some feel is less than savvy. The problem is that it is fairly savvy. In fact he is doing this to specifically undercut the nature of intelligence and spying in the US. This serves the purpose of having no real counter to Russia's well established spy network and intelligence community.
And it allows Putin to have no major adversary in the west. Perhaps some portions of Europe can still challenge him, but undoubtedly he'll work to undermine them as well.
Sure, on the surface it appears that he is trying to promote a point of view that some feel is less than savvy. The problem is that it is fairly savvy. In fact he is doing this to specifically undercut the nature of intelligence and spying in the US. This serves the purpose of having no real counter to Russia's well established spy network and intelligence community.
And it allows Putin to have no major adversary in the west. Perhaps some portions of Europe can still challenge him, but undoubtedly he'll work to undermine them as well.
Monday, January 2, 2017
Sunday, January 1, 2017
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)