Thursday, January 2, 2025

The tragedy in New Orleans

On New Year's Eve, there was an attack on revelers who were simply out and enjoying the evening on Bourbon Street. A car made its way into the crowd and killed a number of people.

But once again, we saw some terrible reporting.  Every outlet wanted to get the scoop, and report on it from any angle that might generate interest in content on that outlet.  There were few facts, and a lot of speculation.  Maybe it was a terrorist attack? Maybe it was a more coordinated effort?

It is an absolute tragedy - no doubt about that.  

But I wanted to call out two items that I saw in the reporting.  First, I saw a quote from a contemptible Senator from Louisiana talking about this as a wakeup call, as it being one of the worst things ever, and we need to be ready for attacks like this.  The subtext wasn't lost on me.  The person had a "foreign name" so it feeds into the hysteria.  But he was a US Citizen by birth and his motives (at the time of this writing) are unknown.  And anyway, this is the same Senator who thinks that gun related deaths are a fact of life.  The fact that this incident is different in his mind is really something. 

The other thing that caught my attention was that there were barricades in place to prevent cars from going into pedestrian areas.  But these barricades were undergoing some upgrades specifically to prepare for the superbowl in a few months.  That would mean that the goal was to protect a huge moneymaker in the future at the potential expense of the present.  That gave me pause.

Monday, December 30, 2024

One party has a will, the other sits on its hands

Its always been kind of a thing, but beginning in earnest back in 2016, you had a party (the democrats) who were trying to govern and move us forward, and a party (the republicans) who were trying to exert their will and hold us back. 

The GOP said - You want meaningful change? Nah, we'd rather tell you how to live your life.

It came to a head when Justice Antonin Salia died while Obama was still in office.  The GOP decided that we had to wait to fill the seat until after the election, and rather than DO SOMETHING, the dems went mostly along with it.  

That election was a bit of cluster; Obama was aware there was some form of election interference, but the GOP leadership told him if he pursued anything related to it, they would cry about it being politicized and be big babies. So he mostly let it go (I would assume he hoped the wheels of justice would catch up with all of it).  He and the dems could have - and probably should have -  done something.

T-rump gets "elected" and got to pick a successor to Scalia.

Then, for reasons, I can't understand, Anthony Kennedy retires. There were stories about him being lured into it with some lucrative incentives, but that may just be a story.  Who knows?  That meant T-rump got another appointee. this time flipping a seat from democrat-leaning to republican.

And by the way, the person they put in the role was a person who everyone had concerns about - if memory serves even Marco Rubio publicly said (paraphrasing) "yeah, I'm concerned about his history but I'm going to vote for him anyway" (the "because I'm a sycophant" is implied).

Then, just before the 2020 election, Ruth Bader Ginsberg died, meaning another seat was now open - another democratic one that would sway the balance of power dramatically. 

The dems tried using the same logic the republicans used 4 years prior - that it was an election year so we should wait. Except the republicans saw an opportunity and took it. They wanted what they wanted and didn't care.

And T-rump got to appoint a 3rd justice, fully 1/3 of the court.

What did they do with the power?  They took on several long-standing rules and previous cases and undid protections that we had as a result.  The most notable was the Roe v Wade abortion ruling.  Without a case before the court, they simply upended it and said it was flawed.  

They were able to do this .... because the dems opted not to oppose each step and let it play out.

You had the 2020 election and Biden wins.  But does nothing to try and right the ship.  He doesn't really take on the insurrection.  He doesn't do anything about the court. And meanwhile the GOP continues to consolidate power. 

The 2024 election cycle is another circus.  Biden doesn't want to give up the power he has. And meanwhile T-rump is playing by "other rules" and not involved in a primary per se, but becomes the candidate again.  And it "feels like" there was some kind of conspiracy going on - because he never seemed to care about the election; kind of like he already knew he'd likely win.

Kamala steps in late and talks a big game about doing something....and yet she kind of doesn't do something, either.  She loses, yet doesn't challenge a single vote total or otherwise say much about the election.  

And Biden again had a chance to do something here. Remake the court?  Maybe have been prepared for something like a voting irregularity happening?  Nope.  He just lets it go.

And now the GOP has all the control.  The oval office, both houses, and the court.  And intends to use that power to remake America... will the dems finally put up a fight?  Or will the GOP fracture on its own because everyone wants "something" and there are already disagreements on what those are?

Time will tell.  But for all the hype to "do something" its amazing that no one actually did. 



Drones

At the end of the year, drones made their way into the news several times, and not in a good way.

You had what appeared to be random drones flying over parts of New Jersey, and that started a whirlwind of political puffery and conspiracy theories. You had a few drone shows that had issues - especially one in Orlando where a 7 year old boy was severely injured by a falling drone and was listed in critical condition.  And, you had a few instances of drones being flown too close to airplanes.

These drones are becoming a nuisance.  They are affordable and no doubt fun.  But they are unregulated and it turns out kind of dangerous.  

You have to wonder a bit if we might start taking them seriously before there is a bigger incident of some kind....

Saturday, December 28, 2024

Glad we have these protections. For now.

Scaling back regulations and gutting departments like the FTC will mean that companies can do whatever they want, without any repercussions. 

Marriott turned a blind eye and said "what's the worst that can happen?" And then was ordered to better secure their (well OUR) data. 

Who needs clean water anyway?

Sleeping and Alzheimer’s

While there is no certainty about whether taking sleeping pills would affect the onset of Alzheimer's, this study suggests that it "may" help. 

But the finding more broadly shows that there is a link between sleep and the flushing of plaque buildup in the brain. And that piece of information is really interesting and surely will lead to more and better research and treatments for (or more precisely prevention of) Alzheimer's. 

https://www.sciencealert.com/a-common-sleeping-pill-may-reduce-the-buildup-of-alzheimers-proteins-study-finds