A space elevator to the Moon is now within reach thanks to modern technology

This has been a theoretical dream for as long as man has been trying to reach space.  And now, it come closer to reality with some novel thinking…could a space elevator be anchored to the moon, rather than to earth?

https://www.thebrighterside.news/post/a-space-elevator-to-the-moon-is-now-within-reach-thanks-to-modern-technology/

The Devil they Knew: Chemical Documents Analysis of Industry Influence on PFAS Science

Would you look at that? DuPont and 3M knew that they're were creating dangerous chemicals, documented that, and then hid it from everyone. 

All the while reaping huge profits!

https://annalsofglobalhealth.org/articles/10.5334/aogh.4013

Owners of 'dangerous' dogs will need $100,000 liability insurance under newly signed law • Florida Phoenix

The governor puts on his stupid smile and signs a law about dog owners who need to carry liability insurance. 

But hey, gun owners. You're good. That's just insanity. 

https://floridaphoenix.com/briefs/owners-of-dangerous-dogs-will-need-100000-liability-insurance-under-newly-signed-law/

How is this okay?

The sitting president of the United States held a "private event" - which we know because it was made clear that he was acting as a private citizen and not in an official capacity, so that he would not have to reveal who was in attendance. 

First of all, that's an absurd thing to say. Everything he does is somewhat public. And because there were people from other countries in attendance then this should be classified as a state function. 

Second, the event itself is problematic. It was all about his own crypto currency. The invitees were his "biggest investors."  This raises many questions about them exchanging money for access to him. This violates the emoluments clause, which I remind you says

"No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State."

I'm sure that someone - perhaps the DOJ - will try and tell us some loophole. But are we honestly expected to believe that a group of foreign nationals came to this country, invested in his crypto nonsense, and didn't ask - or won't ask in the future - for something in return in his official capacity?

It's another in a long string of him ignoring the constitution, and you turning a blind eye. 

The obvious question that remains is: what are you going to do about it? 

Habeas corpus

The president wants to ignore the writ of habeas corpus. If you're not exactly sure what that means, it's Latin and it translates to "to have the body" and loosely means that you are to be physically present, or more precisely to be in court yourself before a judge. 

This is spelled out in the constitution thusly:

• This legal procedure ensures that individuals are not held in custody without due process of law. It requires that a person be brought before a court to determine the legality of their detention.

  
  

  
  

And then this fun exchange happened in a senate hearing, with the head of DHS - the whackadoodle Kristi Noem being asked about it:

At a Senate hearing, Senator Maggie Hassan, Democrat of New Hampshire, asked Ms. Noem about the issue. "Secretary Noem," she asked, "what is habeas corpus?"

"Well," Ms. Noem said, "habeas corpus is a constitutional right that the president has to be able to remove people from this country and suspend their right to—"

"No," Ms. Hassan interjected. "Let me stop you, ma'am. Excuse me, that's incorrect."

Well, I suppose that's one way to look at it...

I heard an analyst talking about tariffs.  His "take" was that there are some people close to the president who are conducting a complex dance of sorts.  

They do not want to increase taxes on large - to - mid sized corporations; they know that would be a non-starter.  But they also know that they need to increase revenue in some way to fund the government.  So the aim was to increase the tariff rate so that these companies would pay the fee from their outsized profits.

But the companies are greedy, and decided to simply pass that on to the consumer (and in doing so keep their profits ridiculously high).

It would explain all the angst about showing the tariff amount at some retailers.  The administration just wanted the companies to simply suck it up and pay it.

But the companies decided to screw everyone instead.

Like I said, its a perspective that has some merit perhaps.  Its all just so strange.

Environmental impacts from big pharma

Here's a rather odd story about how pharmaceutical companies create enormous amounts of waste, primarily in the disposal of over production.

And that's crazy, when you consider that we have this weird relationship with healthcare in this country.  People seem to think that its okay to not have healthcare or vaccines, but yet will succumb to sexy marketing for a wonder drug.

Such a weird collision of science, health, and the environment.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/experts-raise-red-flag-researching-110005547.html