The 2024 election was peculiar in that Kamala lost every swing state by a margin that seemed unlikely. And of course. that's in spite of her having led in all of those same states as late as a week or two before the election
And in reviewing the results, there were some voting districts in those states where there were zero votes for Kamala. Zero. Sure, on the surface, It's certainly possible that this was the case, but it doesn't feel right in a way.
To that point, over the last few months, there have been reported vote totals results that raised some eyebrows - people who claim to have voted for Kamala see that there were no votes for her in their district. They have signed affidavits, and are suing to get into discovery. And just to be clear, this is more than just a couple of people who are saying their vote wasn't counted.
Look, I'm not saying there's anything to it. But there is something odd about all of it, and the evidence suggests its worth a look.
And here's where my "tin foil hat moment" comes in. You may recall that after the 2020 election, T-rump filed very many lawsuits against the companies that supply the voting machines. Of course, the stated purpose for the suit was that they wanted to make sure the vote totals were correct and blah blah blah...
But what if their actual goal was to use discovery to understand the voting machines more thoroughly. To get at how they connected to the systems that tabulate the votes. What if the intent was to find a flaw in the security - in order to manipulate future outcomes?
Wouldn't that be something?
Yes, its unlikely, but not improbable.
Just my two cents for today.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.